By Frans H. van Eemeren
In Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse, Frans H. van Eemeren brings jointly the dialectical and the rhetorical dimensions of argumentation by way of introducing the concept that of strategic maneuvering. Strategic maneuvering refers back to the arguer’s continuous efforts to reconcile aiming for effectiveness with being moderate. It happens in all phases of argumentative discourse and manifests itself concurrently within the offerings which are made of the topical capability to be had at a selected level, in variation to viewers call for, and within the use of particular presentational units. Strategic maneuvering derails whilst within the particular context within which the discourse occurs a rule for serious dialogue has been violated, in order that a fallacy has been dedicated. Van Eemeren makes transparent that extending the pragma-dialectical method of argumentation through taking account of strategic maneuvering results in a richer and extra unique approach for studying and comparing argumentative discourse
Read or Download Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation PDF
Best rhetoric books
Smaller, unmarried web page, retail caliber model of a prior upload
Examines the idea that of rhetorical invention from an affirmative, nondialectical perspective.
From the again Cover
The way forward for Invention hyperlinks classical rhetorical practices of invention with the philosophical paintings of Gilles Deleuze and Jacques Derrida and proposes that probably the most the most important implications of postmodern concept have long past principally unattended. Drawing on such classical rhetorical strategies as doxa, imitation, kairos, and topos, and fascinating key works by way of Aristotle, Plato, the Sophists, and others, John Muckelbauer demonstrates how rhetorical invention can supply a nondialectical, "affirmative" feel of swap that invitations us to reconsider the ways that we learn, write, and reply to others.
"This might be the main fascinating and cutting edge (inventive) booklet on rhetorical invention I've encountered on the grounds that Deleuze's what's Philosophy? Muckelbauer not just contributes to but in addition essentially alters the dialog in this subject. He manages anything that's virtually nonexistent within the field--to learn (to keep on with textual strains, openings, possibilities) instead of just to interpret. so much stories in rhetorical invention, formerly, were mired in a number of humanist presumptions concerning the thinking/inventing subject--this paintings deals a major problem to that process, now not by means of arguing with it yet by means of acting anything very assorted. " -- Diane Davis, writer of breaking apart [at] Totality: A Rhetoric of Laughter
"This ebook incorporates a wealth of artistic techniques to big concerns in either postmodern thought and the sphere of rhetorical experiences. Muckelbauer argues for and provides an unique type of engagement with those matters that transforms scholarly discourse on invention. " -- Bradford Vivian, writer of Being Made unusual: Rhetoric past Representation
About the Author
John Muckelbauer is Assistant Professor of English on the college of South Carolina.
This publication represents the main complete account up to now of overseas language writing. Its simple target is to mirror severely on the place the sphere is now and the place it must pass subsequent within the exploration of international language writing on the degrees of conception, study, and pedagogy.
Many aspects is the 1st full-length examine of Protagorean antilogic, an argumentative perform with deep roots in rhetorical historical past and renewed relevance for modern tradition. based at the philosophical relativism of Protagoras, antilogic is a dynamic instead of a proper method of argument, targeted largely at the dialogical interplay of opposing positions (anti-logoi) in controversy.
In Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse, Frans H. van Eemeren brings jointly the dialectical and the rhetorical dimensions of argumentation by way of introducing the idea that of strategic maneuvering. Strategic maneuvering refers back to the arguer’s continuous efforts to reconcile aiming for effectiveness with being moderate.
- Tell It Slant: Writing and Shaping Creative Nonfiction
- Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation
- Dialogicity in Written Specialised Genres (Dialogue Studies)
- Scientists as Prophets: A Rhetorical Genealogy
- Academic Writing in Context
Additional resources for Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation
23. ). 24. Pragmatists judge the acceptability of norms depending on the extent to which they appear successful in solving the problems they are designed to solve. In fact, to them a norm is a norm only if it performs a function in the achievement of objectives set by the pragmatist. Cf. ” Those wanting to resolve differences of opinion and judge resolution procedures primarily on instrumental grounds, having as their main purpose to achieve an optimally satisfactory result for as many as possible of those involved (instead of, for example, as much personal gain or enjoyment as possible), can be characterized as utilitarians.
Apart from the analyst’s references to discursive operations that involve an externalizing reconstruction of a logical reasoning process in which he points to certain presuppositions or implications of what is said in the discourse, his references to discursive operations can also involve reconstructions of pragmatic inferences supported by the use of common sense, such as when he points to pragmatic inconsistencies in the discourse or to Gricean implicatures. Fourth, there is background information the analyst can use as a source for justifying his analysis.
Popper in The Open Society and Its Enemies (1971a, Ch. 5, n. 6). 26. Although Habermas’ ideal of consensus (1971) in a speech situation of communication unimpaired by power relations rests on philosophical starting points different from ours, his ideal is in some respects not dissimilar to ours, but in view of the pragma-dialectical conception of intellectual doubt and criticism as the driving forces of progress, it is eventually not consensus that we are after but rather a continual flux of ever more advanced opinions.