By Stephen Edelston Toulmin
Within the 17th century, a imaginative and prescient arose which used to be to captivate the Western mind's eye for the following 300 years: the imaginative and prescient of Cosmopolis, a society as rationally ordered because the Newtonian view of nature. whereas fueling remarkable advances in all fields of human pastime, this imaginative and prescient perpetuated a hidden but chronic schedule: the myth that human nature and society can be outfitted into specified and potential rational different types. Stephen Toulmin confronts that agenda—its illusions and its outcomes for our current and destiny world.
"By displaying how varied the final 3 centuries may were if Montaigne, instead of Descartes, have been taken as a kick off point, Toulmin is helping ruin the semblance that the Cartesian quest for sure bet is intrinsic to the character of technology or philosophy."—Richard M. Rorty, college of Virginia
"[Toulmin] has now tackled maybe his so much bold subject matter of all. . . . His target is not anything under to put earlier than us an account of either the origins and the clients of our distinctively glossy global. through charting the evolution of modernity, he hopes to teach us what highbrow posture we should undertake as we confront the arrival millennium."—Quentin Skinner, big apple assessment of Books
Read or Download Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity PDF
Best rhetoric books
Smaller, unmarried web page, retail caliber model of a prior upload
Examines the idea that of rhetorical invention from an affirmative, nondialectical perspective.
From the again Cover
The way forward for Invention hyperlinks classical rhetorical practices of invention with the philosophical paintings of Gilles Deleuze and Jacques Derrida and proposes that probably the most the most important implications of postmodern concept have long past mostly unattended. Drawing on such classical rhetorical strategies as doxa, imitation, kairos, and topos, and interesting key works by means of Aristotle, Plato, the Sophists, and others, John Muckelbauer demonstrates how rhetorical invention can provide a nondialectical, "affirmative" feel of switch that invitations us to reconsider the ways that we learn, write, and reply to others.
"This could be the main attention-grabbing and leading edge (inventive) booklet on rhetorical invention I've encountered for the reason that Deleuze's what's Philosophy? Muckelbauer not just contributes to but additionally essentially alters the dialog in this subject. He manages whatever that's virtually nonexistent within the field--to learn (to stick to textual lines, openings, possibilities) instead of just to interpret. so much experiences in rhetorical invention, earlier, were mired in a number of humanist presumptions in regards to the thinking/inventing subject--this paintings deals a significant problem to that procedure, no longer by means of arguing with it yet through appearing whatever very diverse. " -- Diane Davis, writer of breaking apart [at] Totality: A Rhetoric of Laughter
"This publication includes a wealth of creative ways to special concerns in either postmodern thought and the sector of rhetorical stories. Muckelbauer argues for and gives an unique type of engagement with those concerns that transforms scholarly discourse on invention. " -- Bradford Vivian, writer of Being Made unusual: Rhetoric past Representation
About the Author
John Muckelbauer is Assistant Professor of English on the collage of South Carolina.
This booklet represents the main complete account thus far of international language writing. Its uncomplicated target is to mirror significantly on the place the sphere is now and the place it must pass subsequent within the exploration of overseas language writing on the degrees of idea, study, and pedagogy.
Many aspects is the 1st full-length learn of Protagorean antilogic, an argumentative perform with deep roots in rhetorical background and renewed relevance for modern tradition. based at the philosophical relativism of Protagoras, antilogic is a dynamic instead of a proper method of argument, targeted largely at the dialogical interplay of opposing positions (anti-logoi) in controversy.
In Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse, Frans H. van Eemeren brings jointly the dialectical and the rhetorical dimensions of argumentation through introducing the concept that of strategic maneuvering. Strategic maneuvering refers back to the arguer’s continuous efforts to reconcile aiming for effectiveness with being moderate.
- Rhetoric and Violence in Northern Ireland, 1968-98: Hardened to Death
- Jacobean Poetry and Prose: Rhetoric, Representation, and the Popular Imagination
- The Practice of Theory: Rhetoric, Knowledge, and Pedagogy in the Academy (Literature, Culture, Theory)
- Cognition, Vol. 10, No. 1-3
- The Write Stuff: Thinking Through Essays (2nd Edition)
- Reclaiming Queer: Activist and Academic Rhetorics of Resistance (Albma Rhetoric Cult & Soc Crit)
Additional info for Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity
In the moral theologiansand philosophers Middle Ages and the Renaissance, handled moral issuesusing caseanalyseslike those that still have a place in Anglo-American common case law. In the 1540s,however,AntoineArnaud,a closefriend of the mathematicianBlaisePascal, was indicted in the ecclesiastical court at parison a chatgeof heresy,at the insistenceof the Jesuits:in his defense,pascal published a seriesof anonymousProuincial Lenqs. The sarcasmof his lettersridiculed theJesuitsferociously,and brought the whole enterprise of "caseethics" into lastingdiscredit.
The recoveryof ancienthistoryand literatureonly intensified their feeling for the kaleidoscopicdiversityand contextualdependenceof \flhatIs the ProblemAboutModernity? The ground was first prepared for redirecting the arts of narrative (which earlierhad playedapanin caselaw or moral theology)into the "novel of character"and other new literary genres. scholarswere quite asconcernedwith circumstantialquesRenaissance tionsof practicein medicine,law,or morals,aswith anytimeless,universal manersof philosophicaltheory.
All problems in the practice of law and medicine are "timely". In them, "time is of the essence"; and they are decided, in Aristotle's phrase,pros ton kairon, "as occasion requires". The relevant sumsmay havebeen performed impeccably;but,if the resultingacrionis unduly delayed,the decisionwill become "irrational". For 16th-century scholars,the very model of a "rational enterprise" wasnot Sciencebut [aw. Ahundredyearslater,the shoewason the other foot. For Descartesand his successors, timely questionswere no concern of philosophy:instead,their aimwasto bring to light permanentstructures underlying all the changeablephenomenaof Nature.