By Saadia Malik, Andrew Trotman, Mounia Lalmas, Norbert Fuhr (auth.), Norbert Fuhr, Mounia Lalmas, Andrew Trotman (eds.)
This ebook constitutes the completely refereed post-proceedings of the fifth foreign Workshop of the Initiative for the assessment of XML Retrieval, INEX 2006, held at Dagstuhl citadel, Germany, in December 2006.
The forty nine revised complete papers offered have been rigorously chosen for presentation on the workshop and went via a next around of cautious reviewing and revision. The papers are geared up in topical sections on technique, and seven extra tracks on ad-hoc, average language processing, heterogeneous assortment, multimedia, interactive, use case, in addition to record mining.
Read Online or Download Comparative Evaluation of XML Information Retrieval Systems: 5th International Workshop of the Initiative for the Evaluation of XML Retrieval, INEX 2006, Dagstuhl Castle, Germany, December 17-20, 2006, Revised and Selected Papers PDF
Best international conferences and symposiums books
Databaseresearchisa? eldofcomputersciencewheretheorymeetsapplications. Many thoughts and strategies, that have been considered as problems with theoretical curiosity while before everything proposed, at the moment are incorporated in applied database structures and comparable items. Examples abound within the ? elds of database layout, question languages, question optimization, concurrency regulate, statistical databases, etc.
This ebook constitutes the refereed court cases of the fifth overseas Workshop on Interactive allotted Multimedia platforms and Telecommunication providers, IDMS'98, held in Oslo, Norway, in September 1998. The 23 revised complete papers offered have been conscientiously chosen from a complete of sixty eight submissions.
This publication constitutes the completely refereed post-proceedings of the thirty first overseas Workshop on Graph-Theoretic options in computing device technology, WG 2005, held in Metz, France in June 2005. The 38 revised complete papers provided including 2 invited papers have been conscientiously chosen from one hundred twenty five submissions.
- Digital Rights Management: ACM CCS-9 Workshop, DRM 2002, Washington, DC, USA, November 18, 2002. Revised Papers
- Policies and Research in Identity Management: Second IFIP WG 11.6 Working Conference, IDMAN 2010, Oslo, Norway, November 18-19, 2010. Proceedings
- Artificial Evolution: European Conference, AE 95 Brest, France, September 4–6, 1995 Selected Papers
- Advances in Information Systems: Second International Conference, ADVIS 2002 Izmir, Turkey, October 23–25, 2002 Proceedings
- KI-94: Advances in Artificial Intelligence: 18th German Annual Conference on Artificial Intelligence Saarbrücken, Germany, September 18–23, 1994 Proceedings
- Higher Order Logic Theorem Proving and Its Applications: 7th International Workshop Valletta, Malta, September 19–22, 1994 Proceedings
Additional resources for Comparative Evaluation of XML Information Retrieval Systems: 5th International Workshop of the Initiative for the Evaluation of XML Retrieval, INEX 2006, Dagstuhl Castle, Germany, December 17-20, 2006, Revised and Selected Papers
In Figure 3, this method selects the node: a. Full Recall-Base (Full RB): For comparison reasons, we also use the full recall-base where all relevant nodes, including overlapping nodes, appear in the ideal set. From the sample tree in Figure 3, this method selects all relevant nodes: a, b, c, d, e, f, g and h. Fig. 3. An example XML tree. Relevant nodes are indicated by ﬁlled circles. The speciﬁcity score is shown next to each relevant node. The Leaf and Article Nodes methods represent the two extremes of all possible selection mechanisms.
07) and the Article Node (all nodes here have depth of 1) methods. Comparing the nxCG measures at various cutoﬀs, we see that as the cutoﬀ is increased, the results produced by the Standard, S. , Leaf Node and P. of Leaf Nodes methods tend to agree more with each other’s conclusions, and tend to disagree with the results of the Article Node method. The same can be said for the MAnxCG measures. Between the nxCG and MAnxCG measures, we can see that the latter is more resilient to changes in the ideal recall-base at lower cutoﬀs.
Exhaustivity value ) in INEX 2006; and (3) the probability that the user goes from one element in the list to a target (BEP). For the best in context retrieval task, this probability is deﬁned as s(x, b), as deﬁned in Equation 14, for any BEP b. e. we only know that a random user sees the BEP with probability s(x, b) if presented the element x in the list. With these settings, a ranking only made of BEPs will obtain a constant precision of 1 for all recall levels. The performance slowly decreases when returned elements are further away from the BEPs, and reach 0 when returned elements are not in relevant articles.