By Ellen Contini-Morava
Read or Download Cognitive and Communicative Approaches to Linguistic Analysis PDF
Best rhetoric books
Smaller, unmarried web page, retail caliber model of a prior upload
Examines the concept that of rhetorical invention from an affirmative, nondialectical perspective.
From the again Cover
The way forward for Invention hyperlinks classical rhetorical practices of invention with the philosophical paintings of Gilles Deleuze and Jacques Derrida and proposes that probably the most an important implications of postmodern idea have long past mostly unattended. Drawing on such classical rhetorical options as doxa, imitation, kairos, and topos, and interesting key works by means of Aristotle, Plato, the Sophists, and others, John Muckelbauer demonstrates how rhetorical invention can supply a nondialectical, "affirmative" feel of swap that invitations us to reconsider the ways that we learn, write, and reply to others.
"This may be the main fascinating and leading edge (inventive) e-book on rhetorical invention I've encountered considering that Deleuze's what's Philosophy? Muckelbauer not just contributes to but in addition essentially alters the dialog in this subject. He manages anything that's virtually nonexistent within the field--to learn (to stick to textual lines, openings, possibilities) instead of just to interpret. so much reviews in rhetorical invention, in the past, were mired in a number of humanist presumptions in regards to the thinking/inventing subject--this paintings bargains a major problem to that procedure, no longer by way of arguing with it yet by way of appearing anything very assorted. " -- Diane Davis, writer of breaking apart [at] Totality: A Rhetoric of Laughter
"This e-book encompasses a wealth of creative ways to big concerns in either postmodern conception and the sphere of rhetorical stories. Muckelbauer argues for and provides an unique kind of engagement with those matters that transforms scholarly discourse on invention. " -- Bradford Vivian, writer of Being Made unusual: Rhetoric past Representation
About the Author
John Muckelbauer is Assistant Professor of English on the collage of South Carolina.
This ebook represents the main accomplished account up to now of overseas language writing. Its simple target is to mirror significantly on the place the sphere is now and the place it must cross subsequent within the exploration of overseas language writing on the degrees of conception, study, and pedagogy.
Many facets is the 1st full-length learn of Protagorean antilogic, an argumentative perform with deep roots in rhetorical background and renewed relevance for modern tradition. based at the philosophical relativism of Protagoras, antilogic is a dynamic instead of a proper method of argument, targeted largely at the dialogical interplay of opposing positions (anti-logoi) in controversy.
In Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse, Frans H. van Eemeren brings jointly the dialectical and the rhetorical dimensions of argumentation by way of introducing the concept that of strategic maneuvering. Strategic maneuvering refers back to the arguer’s continuous efforts to reconcile aiming for effectiveness with being average.
- In Defence of Rhetoric - (Chapter 1)
- Winged Word: Study in the Technique of Ancient Greek Oral Composition as Seen Principally Through Hesiod's Work and Days
- Structuralism and Semiotics (New Accents)
- Oxford Handbook of Commercial Correspondence
Additional resources for Cognitive and Communicative Approaches to Linguistic Analysis
A great deal must be known in advance about cognition for grammatical analysis to be possible; so much, in fact, that the writing of a complete cognitive grammar is presently unfeasible . . A Columbia-school analysis starts with much less: morphemes and their observed occurrences . . Columbia-school linguists thus allow the feasibility of writing complete grammars, and in fact attempt to do so. [pp. 329–331] This gives a very inaccurate impression. Most of what I think I know about cognition was inspired by linguistic analysis, and the same is true of Cognitive linguistics 4 42 Ronald W.
Discussion Why does this type of construction exist? Indeed, why is it cross-linguistically prevalent? It is not an idiosyncrasy of one language, or even one linguistic area, so it must have some functional motivation. Its function, I suggest, resembles that of so-called “raising” constructions, which provide a means for naturally salient entities to occur in grammatically salient positions (notably clausal subject): (22) a. For the prime minister to resign is unlikely. b. The prime minister is unlikely to resign.
There is usually a primary focal participant, termed the trajector (tr), and often a secondary focal participant, called a landmark (lm). The trajector is the entity the expression seeks to locate, track, assess, or characterize, and a landmark (when present) is another salient entity evoked for this purpose. In the case of above, the trajector is located in the vertical dimension with respect to a landmark found at a lower point along this axis, whereas below reverses these speciﬁcations and situates its trajector with respect to a landmark found at a higher point.