By Debra Hawhee
The function of athletics in old Greece prolonged well past the geographical regions of kinesiology, festival, and leisure. In educating and philosophy, athletic practices overlapped with rhetorical ones and shaped a shared mode of information creation. "Bodily Arts" examines this interesting intersection, delivering a tremendous context for realizing the attitudes of old Greeks towards themselves and their surroundings. In classical society, rhetoric was once an task, one who used to be in essence 'performed'. Detailing how athletics got here to be rhetoric's 'twin paintings' within the physically features of studying and function, "Bodily Arts" attracts on diversified orators and philosophers reminiscent of Isocrates, Demosthenes, and Plato, in addition to clinical treatises and a wealth of artifacts from the time, together with statues and vases. Debra Hawhee's insightful examine spotlights the idea of a classical gym because the place for a recurring 'mingling' of athletic and rhetorical performances, and using historical athletic guide to create rhetorical education in response to rhythm, repetition, and reaction. providing her information opposed to the backdrop of a extensive cultural viewpoint instead of a slim disciplinary one, Hawhee offers a pioneering interpretation of Greek civilization from the 6th, 5th, and fourth centuries BCE via gazing its voters in motion.
Read Online or Download Bodily Arts: Rhetoric and Athletics in Ancient Greece PDF
Best rhetoric books
Smaller, unmarried web page, retail caliber model of a prior upload
Examines the idea that of rhetorical invention from an affirmative, nondialectical perspective.
From the again Cover
The way forward for Invention hyperlinks classical rhetorical practices of invention with the philosophical paintings of Gilles Deleuze and Jacques Derrida and proposes that essentially the most the most important implications of postmodern idea have long gone mostly unattended. Drawing on such classical rhetorical thoughts as doxa, imitation, kairos, and topos, and fascinating key works by way of Aristotle, Plato, the Sophists, and others, John Muckelbauer demonstrates how rhetorical invention can provide a nondialectical, "affirmative" experience of switch that invitations us to reconsider the ways that we learn, write, and reply to others.
"This is likely to be the main attention-grabbing and cutting edge (inventive) publication on rhetorical invention I've encountered on account that Deleuze's what's Philosophy? Muckelbauer not just contributes to but additionally essentially alters the dialog in this subject. He manages whatever that's nearly nonexistent within the field--to learn (to stick with textual strains, openings, possibilities) instead of just to interpret. so much reports in rhetorical invention, beforehand, were mired in a number of humanist presumptions concerning the thinking/inventing subject--this paintings bargains a significant problem to that method, now not via arguing with it yet by way of appearing anything very various. " -- Diane Davis, writer of breaking apart [at] Totality: A Rhetoric of Laughter
"This e-book encompasses a wealth of artistic ways to special concerns in either postmodern idea and the sphere of rhetorical experiences. Muckelbauer argues for and gives an unique kind of engagement with those matters that transforms scholarly discourse on invention. " -- Bradford Vivian, writer of Being Made unusual: Rhetoric past Representation
About the Author
John Muckelbauer is Assistant Professor of English on the collage of South Carolina.
This ebook represents the main complete account thus far of overseas language writing. Its uncomplicated goal is to mirror significantly on the place the sector is now and the place it must pass subsequent within the exploration of international language writing on the degrees of idea, examine, and pedagogy.
Many facets is the 1st full-length research of Protagorean antilogic, an argumentative perform with deep roots in rhetorical heritage and renewed relevance for modern tradition. based at the philosophical relativism of Protagoras, antilogic is a dynamic instead of a proper method of argument, concentrated largely at the dialogical interplay of opposing positions (anti-logoi) in controversy.
In Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse, Frans H. van Eemeren brings jointly the dialectical and the rhetorical dimensions of argumentation through introducing the concept that of strategic maneuvering. Strategic maneuvering refers back to the arguer’s continuous efforts to reconcile aiming for effectiveness with being moderate.
- Hiphop Literacies
- Toward a Linguistic Theory of Speech Acts
- Narratives in Popular Culture, Media, and Everyday Life
- About Language: A Reader for Writers
Additional resources for Bodily Arts: Rhetoric and Athletics in Ancient Greece
Thus at the heart of the ancient agōn lies the concept of aretē, for the struggling contest served as a stage of sorts. Early on aretē was associated with the goodness, courage, and prowess of a warrior. 279). 536) with the utmost glory, a guarantor of aretē. Conceptually, aretē was tightly bound with agathos (goodness), kleos (glory), timē (honor), and philotimia (love of honor). As David Cohen points out, the norms and practices of Athenian virtuosity ‘‘operate within the politics of reputation, whose normative poles are honor and shame’’ (1991: 183).
And then there were the crowns: a golden crown conferred by the Athenian Assembly signiﬁed not absolute rule, but absolute aretē. As Aeschines indicates, the crown functions as a material marker of a citizen-leader’s virtuosity (aretē) and justice (dikaiosunē) (Aeschines, Against Ctesiphon 10), and when in 337 Demosthenes’ friend Ctesiphon proposed that a crown be conferred on Demosthenes for his leadership during the war and recovery, it would have been the third crown Demosthenes had received in ﬁve years (Sealey 1993: 201; Demosthenes, On the Crown 83).
536) with the utmost glory, a guarantor of aretē. Conceptually, aretē was tightly bound with agathos (goodness), kleos (glory), timē (honor), and philotimia (love of honor). As David Cohen points out, the norms and practices of Athenian virtuosity ‘‘operate within the politics of reputation, whose normative poles are honor and shame’’ (1991: 183). As such, aretē functions as an external phenomenon, depending on forces outside the ‘‘self’’ for its instantiation. Aretē thus operated within an economy of actions, wherein certain acts, such as dying in battle or securing a victory at the Olympic Games, were considered agathos and hence deserving of honor, CONTE STI NG VI RTUOS ITY 17 and certain acts were not.