By T. Edward Damer
More and more university classes and courses require a severe pondering component--and comprise assignments intended to degree your serious pondering abilities. ATTACKING defective REASONING: a realistic advisor TO FALLACY-FREE ARGUMENTS, 6th version, may help brush up on those skills--and how to boost the logical, persuasive arguments you wish now and all through your occupation. this beneficial guide addresses greater than 60 universal fallacies of good judgment with the aid of over 2 hundred memorable examples. It presents motives and suggestions for keeping off wrong pondering, and is a perfect source while writing papers, essays, or arguments.
Read Online or Download Attacking Faulty Reasoning: A Practical Guide to Fallacy-Free Arguments PDF
Best rhetoric books
Smaller, unmarried web page, retail caliber model of a prior upload
Examines the concept that of rhetorical invention from an affirmative, nondialectical perspective.
From the again Cover
The way forward for Invention hyperlinks classical rhetorical practices of invention with the philosophical paintings of Gilles Deleuze and Jacques Derrida and proposes that the most an important implications of postmodern idea have long past principally unattended. Drawing on such classical rhetorical thoughts as doxa, imitation, kairos, and topos, and fascinating key works by way of Aristotle, Plato, the Sophists, and others, John Muckelbauer demonstrates how rhetorical invention can provide a nondialectical, "affirmative" experience of swap that invitations us to reconsider the ways that we learn, write, and reply to others.
"This might be the main fascinating and cutting edge (inventive) publication on rhetorical invention I've encountered considering the fact that Deleuze's what's Philosophy? Muckelbauer not just contributes to but in addition essentially alters the dialog in this subject. He manages whatever that's virtually nonexistent within the field--to learn (to keep on with textual lines, openings, prospects) instead of just to interpret. such a lot experiences in rhetorical invention, in the past, were mired in a number of humanist presumptions in regards to the thinking/inventing subject--this paintings bargains a major problem to that strategy, no longer by means of arguing with it yet via appearing anything very assorted. " -- Diane Davis, writer of breaking apart [at] Totality: A Rhetoric of Laughter
"This ebook encompasses a wealth of creative ways to special concerns in either postmodern conception and the sphere of rhetorical experiences. Muckelbauer argues for and provides an unique form of engagement with those concerns that transforms scholarly discourse on invention. " -- Bradford Vivian, writer of Being Made unusual: Rhetoric past Representation
About the Author
John Muckelbauer is Assistant Professor of English on the college of South Carolina.
This ebook represents the main entire account up to now of overseas language writing. Its uncomplicated goal is to mirror severely on the place the sphere is now and the place it must cross subsequent within the exploration of overseas language writing on the degrees of idea, examine, and pedagogy.
Many facets is the 1st full-length research of Protagorean antilogic, an argumentative perform with deep roots in rhetorical background and renewed relevance for modern tradition. based at the philosophical relativism of Protagoras, antilogic is a dynamic instead of a proper method of argument, concentrated largely at the dialogical interplay of opposing positions (anti-logoi) in controversy.
In Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse, Frans H. van Eemeren brings jointly the dialectical and the rhetorical dimensions of argumentation by way of introducing the concept that of strategic maneuvering. Strategic maneuvering refers back to the arguer’s continuous efforts to reconcile aiming for effectiveness with being moderate.
- Language and Characterisation in Plays and Texts
- Mania and Literary Style: The Rhetoric of Enthusiasm from the Ranters to Christopher Smart (Cambridge Studies in Eighteenth-Century English Literature and Thought)
- Beyond Argument: Essaying as a Practice of (Ex)Change (Perspectives on Writing)
- Ancient Rhetoric and Oratory (Blackwell Introductions to the Classical World)
- Fictions in Autobiography: Studies in the Art of Self-Invention (Princeton Legacy Library)
Additional info for Attacking Faulty Reasoning: A Practical Guide to Fallacy-Free Arguments
There should be no confusion about the notion of a common-knowledge claim. Such a claim is not identiﬁed by determining what most people believe to be true. For example, although 95 percent of Americans believe or accept the claim that God exists, the question of whether God exists is in serious dispute by competent scholars. Therefore, whereas the claim that God exists may very well be the conclusion of an argument, it cannot serve as a premise in an argument because the existence of God is not a matter of undisputed common knowledge.
The fact that most people unthinkingly profess the discussion-stopping cliché that “beauty is in the eye of the beholder” when they disagree with us doesn’t stop them from trying to convince us that our contrary judgments are wrong. What is this all about? Perhaps they genuinely want to bring us to the point of sharing their aesthetic judgment, but they simply do not know how to do it, just as one who wants to persuade us of a moral judgment may not understand enough about how the moral what is an argument?
Hence, if we don’t deal with the best version now, we will eventually have to do so, once an uncharitable version has been corrected by the arguer or others. We would do well, then, to be fair about it in the ﬁrst place by letting our opponents amend any portion of our reconstruction of their arguments. DEDUCTIVE VERSUS INDUCTIVE STRENGTH OF ARGUMENTS A fair appraisal of an argument sometimes depends on an understanding of the difference between an inductive and a deductive argument, because the category to which an argument may belong suggests something important about its relative strength.