By James B. Freeman
This monograph first provides a mode of diagramming argument macrostructure, synthesizing the normal circle and arrow strategy with the Toulmin version. A theoretical justification of this technique via a dialectical knowing of argument, a serious exam of Toulmin on warrants, an intensive dialogue of the linked-convergent contrast, and an account of the right kind reconstruction of enthymemes follows.
Read Online or Download Argument Structure:: Representation and Theory (Argumentation Library) PDF
Best rhetoric books
Smaller, unmarried web page, retail caliber model of a prior upload
Examines the idea that of rhetorical invention from an affirmative, nondialectical perspective.
From the again Cover
The way forward for Invention hyperlinks classical rhetorical practices of invention with the philosophical paintings of Gilles Deleuze and Jacques Derrida and proposes that probably the most an important implications of postmodern idea have long gone principally unattended. Drawing on such classical rhetorical thoughts as doxa, imitation, kairos, and topos, and fascinating key works by way of Aristotle, Plato, the Sophists, and others, John Muckelbauer demonstrates how rhetorical invention can provide a nondialectical, "affirmative" feel of switch that invitations us to reconsider the ways that we learn, write, and reply to others.
"This is likely to be the main fascinating and cutting edge (inventive) booklet on rhetorical invention I've encountered when you consider that Deleuze's what's Philosophy? Muckelbauer not just contributes to but in addition essentially alters the dialog in this subject. He manages anything that's nearly nonexistent within the field--to learn (to stick with textual strains, openings, possibilities) instead of just to interpret. such a lot reports in rhetorical invention, beforehand, were mired in a number of humanist presumptions in regards to the thinking/inventing subject--this paintings deals a major problem to that process, now not by means of arguing with it yet by means of appearing whatever very various. " -- Diane Davis, writer of breaking apart [at] Totality: A Rhetoric of Laughter
"This ebook features a wealth of creative techniques to special matters in either postmodern concept and the sector of rhetorical reports. Muckelbauer argues for and provides an unique form of engagement with those concerns that transforms scholarly discourse on invention. " -- Bradford Vivian, writer of Being Made unusual: Rhetoric past Representation
About the Author
John Muckelbauer is Assistant Professor of English on the collage of South Carolina.
This publication represents the main complete account thus far of international language writing. Its simple goal is to mirror seriously on the place the sphere is now and the place it must pass subsequent within the exploration of overseas language writing on the degrees of concept, learn, and pedagogy.
Many aspects is the 1st full-length examine of Protagorean antilogic, an argumentative perform with deep roots in rhetorical historical past and renewed relevance for modern tradition. based at the philosophical relativism of Protagoras, antilogic is a dynamic instead of a proper method of argument, concentrated largely at the dialogical interplay of opposing positions (anti-logoi) in controversy.
In Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse, Frans H. van Eemeren brings jointly the dialectical and the rhetorical dimensions of argumentation via introducing the concept that of strategic maneuvering. Strategic maneuvering refers back to the arguer’s continuous efforts to reconcile aiming for effectiveness with being average.
- Dialectical Rhetoric
- The Art of Persuasion in Greece (A History of Rhetoric, Vol. 1)
- Second Language Writing (Cambridge Applied Linguistics): Research Insights for the Classroom
- Scenarios: The Art of Strategic Conversation
- The Handbook of Rhetoric and Public Address
Additional info for Argument Structure:: Representation and Theory (Argumentation Library)
Notice that the warrant of the proponent’s argument at this point, unlike Modus ponens which is a two-premise formal inference rule, is a one-premise material inference rule. 4 Integrating the Standard Approach and the Toulmin Model From: To infer: 15 Demand for x in general is rising Prices for x in general will rise Should the challenger ask for the warrant, stating this rule would be the proper answer. Now it is at least conceivable that in composing an argument, a proponent might begin by asserting (1) Prices for goods in general will rise because (2) Demand for goods in general is increasing But, taking the challenger as representative of the audience he is addressing, he might imagine her not seeing why (2) is relevant to (1).
The core argument presents a fact about the will to justify the claim about Judith’s share in the inheritance. How does the rest of the passage fit into the argumentation? Mental incompetence could invalidate a will. The proponent is considering an objection to his inference. But his reply that Mrs. Wilson was known competent does not, by itself, constitute evidence for the conclusion about Judith’s share in the inheritance, nor does the stated premise explain why the statement about mental competence is relevant to the claim about Judith’s share, nor does that premise need this information about mental competence to be seen relevant to the claim.
Sworn witnesses testify that he had talked about stealing money. He had opportunity—he owned a gun, ski mask, and he knew that the bank would be deserted of customers in the early afternoon. Most telling of all, most of the bills stolen were stored in his garage. It looks like the prosecutor has a good case, but the defense attorney now introduces the testimony of witnesses who will swear to having seen and recognized the defendant at another place at the time bank video equipment indicates that the robbery occurred.