By Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst
Experts in argumentation idea current a view of argumentation as a way of resolving alterations of opinion by means of checking out the acceptability of the disputed positions. Their version of a "critical discussion" serves as a theoretical software for reading, comparing and generating argumentative discourse. This significant contribution to the research of argumentation can be of specific worth to pros and graduate scholars in speech communique, casual common sense, rhetoric, serious pondering, linguistics, and philosophy.
Read or Download A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach PDF
Similar rhetoric books
Smaller, unmarried web page, retail caliber model of a prior upload
Examines the idea that of rhetorical invention from an affirmative, nondialectical perspective.
From the again Cover
The way forward for Invention hyperlinks classical rhetorical practices of invention with the philosophical paintings of Gilles Deleuze and Jacques Derrida and proposes that the most an important implications of postmodern idea have long gone principally unattended. Drawing on such classical rhetorical ideas as doxa, imitation, kairos, and topos, and interesting key works by way of Aristotle, Plato, the Sophists, and others, John Muckelbauer demonstrates how rhetorical invention can provide a nondialectical, "affirmative" experience of switch that invitations us to reconsider the ways that we learn, write, and reply to others.
"This may be the main attention-grabbing and cutting edge (inventive) e-book on rhetorical invention I've encountered on account that Deleuze's what's Philosophy? Muckelbauer not just contributes to but additionally essentially alters the dialog in this subject. He manages anything that's nearly nonexistent within the field--to learn (to persist with textual lines, openings, prospects) instead of just to interpret. such a lot experiences in rhetorical invention, earlier, were mired in a number of humanist presumptions in regards to the thinking/inventing subject--this paintings deals a major problem to that strategy, now not by way of arguing with it yet by way of acting whatever very diversified. " -- Diane Davis, writer of breaking apart [at] Totality: A Rhetoric of Laughter
"This booklet incorporates a wealth of artistic techniques to special matters in either postmodern thought and the sphere of rhetorical experiences. Muckelbauer argues for and gives an unique kind of engagement with those concerns that transforms scholarly discourse on invention. " -- Bradford Vivian, writer of Being Made unusual: Rhetoric past Representation
About the Author
John Muckelbauer is Assistant Professor of English on the collage of South Carolina.
This booklet represents the main entire account up to now of overseas language writing. Its easy target is to mirror severely on the place the sector is now and the place it must cross subsequent within the exploration of overseas language writing on the degrees of thought, learn, and pedagogy.
Many facets is the 1st full-length research of Protagorean antilogic, an argumentative perform with deep roots in rhetorical heritage and renewed relevance for modern tradition. based at the philosophical relativism of Protagoras, antilogic is a dynamic instead of a proper method of argument, concentrated largely at the dialogical interplay of opposing positions (anti-logoi) in controversy.
In Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse, Frans H. van Eemeren brings jointly the dialectical and the rhetorical dimensions of argumentation via introducing the idea that of strategic maneuvering. Strategic maneuvering refers back to the arguer’s continuous efforts to reconcile aiming for effectiveness with being moderate.
- Winning the War of Words: Selling the War on Terror from Afghanistan to Iraq (Praeger Security International)
- Encyclopedia of Rhetoric and Composition: Communication from Ancient Times to the Information Age
- Beyond Argument: Essaying as a Practice of (Ex)Change (Perspectives on Writing)
- Rewriting: How To Do Things With Texts
Extra info for A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach
37 Doing so makes it easier to get an overall picture of the state of the art in the discipline, to distinguish the different approaches from each other, and to indicate where there are genuine opportunities for mutual cooperation. We have developed our dialectical variant of a research program of this kind by systematically combining a critical-rationalist philosophical position with a pragma-dialectical theoretical position, an analytical position that centers around the resolution of differences of opinion, an empirical position oriented toward the process of convincing, and a practical position directed at stimulating reﬂection.
Among the conditions that have to be met if others, in particular teachers, are to make good use of the methods developed by argumentation theorists is the preliminary condition that the institution in which they have to operate indeed provides them with the opportunity to do so. In the case of teachers, this means that there has to be enough room in the curriculum for their efforts. Even if this is the case, it will undoubtedly be some time before the course concerned can be optimally realized.
3 1 2 3 See Van Eemeren and Houtlosser (1999, 2000, 2002a, b), but also Schiappa (2002), Goodwin (2002), Kauffeld (2002), and Jacobs (2002). See Aristotle (1928c) and (1928d). See also Krabbe (2002). See Aristotle (1928a, b, c, d, 1991). See also Hohmann (2002). ” In rhetorical arguments, the premises need only be plausible for the audience that is to be convinced. Deductive and inductive syllogisms are among the means one can use to confer the plausibility of the premises on the conclusion that is to be drawn.